Legal Opinion
Seehus v. Bor-Son Construction, Inc.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided June 10, 2010No. A09-1388PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*146OPINION
DIETZEN, Justice.
David K. Seehus filed a claim petition seeking workers’ compensation benefits for work-related injuries sustained during the course of his employment at Wesley Residence, Inc. (Wesley), on March 19, 2001. Because Wesley’s workers’ compensation insurer was insolvent, the Minnesota Insurance Guarantee Association (MIGA) administered the claim. Subsequently, the workers’ compensation judge ordered See-hus’s previous employer, Bor-Son Construction, Inc. (Bor-Son), and its workers’ compensation insurer, CNA-RSKO (CNA),1 to be joined as parties. Following a hearing, the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Eberhart v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- In Re the Civil Commitment of GiemSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
- Robinette v. PriceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
- Marriage of Rubey v. VannettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Dynamic Air, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Williams v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- Swenson v. NickaboineSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- Chad Nelson, Below v. Troy Schlener, Carla Brown, Below, Minnesota Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
- State of Minnesota, Respondent/Cross-Appellant v. Brian Keith Schnagl, a/k/a Brian Keith Schnagel, Appellant/Cross-Respondent.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
- McCullough and Sons, Inc. v. City of Vadnais Heights, A14-1992Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.