Legal Opinion

Bantz v. Mutual of Enumclaw Ins.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided November 29, 1993No. 19665, 19695PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BISTLINE, Justice.

This is an insurance coverage case which involves the questions of: 1) whether Mer-rie Jo Bantz (Bantz), who is a third-party beneficiary of an uninsured motorist insurance policy, has waived that insurance coverage by settling with some parties before trial without the permission of the insurance company or by failing to give timely notice of her claim to the insurance company, and 2) whether the Minnesota Insurance Guaranty Association (MIGA) may refuse to pay the damages assessed against an individual insured by an insolvent Minnesota insurance company until the…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Pierringer v. HogerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Wescott v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
  3. Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. WebbCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
  4. Silvers v. Horace Mann InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
  5. Kapadia v. Preferred Risk Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1988

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Ferrando v. Auto-Owners Mutual InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Weinstein v. Prudential Property & Casualty InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Taylor v. Government Employees Insurance Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Hasper v. Center Mutual Insurance Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  5. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. GreenUtah Supreme Court · 2003

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API