Freeman v. Armour Food Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
SIMONETT, Justice.
The compensation judge and the Workers’- Compensation Court of Appeals held that a no-fault auto carrier was entitled to intervene in an employee’s claim proceeding to seek reimbursement for no-fault benefits paid at a time when the employee was also entitled to workers’ compensation benefits. We affirm. We also affirm, but on different grounds, the WCCA’s award of reimbursement to the no-fault carrier.
As a result oi repeated strain of her neck and shoulder muscles while working for relator Armour Food Company, employee Susan M. Freeman sustained a bilateral thoracic outlet…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Schulte v. CH PETERSON CONSTRUCTION COMPANYSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
- Hagen v. VenemSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Lemmer v. Batzli Electric Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
- Griebel v. Tri-State Insurance Co. of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Sullivan v. Hagstrom Construction Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Taft v. Advance United ExpresswaysSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
- Easterling v. Woodward Lumber Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1991
- Mann v. Unity Medical Center/Health CentralSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- Colonial Insurance Co. of California v. Minnesota Assigned Risk PlanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
- Martin v. Morrison Trucking, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.