Legal Opinion

Freeman v. Armour Food Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 14, 1986No. C6-85-1009PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMONETT, Justice.

The compensation judge and the Workers’- Compensation Court of Appeals held that a no-fault auto carrier was entitled to intervene in an employee’s claim proceeding to seek reimbursement for no-fault benefits paid at a time when the employee was also entitled to workers’ compensation benefits. We affirm. We also affirm, but on different grounds, the WCCA’s award of reimbursement to the no-fault carrier.

As a result oi repeated strain of her neck and shoulder muscles while working for relator Armour Food Company, employee Susan M. Freeman sustained a bilateral thoracic outlet…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Schulte v. CH PETERSON CONSTRUCTION COMPANYSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
  2. Hagen v. VenemSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  3. Lemmer v. Batzli Electric Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
  4. Griebel v. Tri-State Insurance Co. of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  5. Sullivan v. Hagstrom Construction Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1955

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Taft v. Advance United ExpresswaysSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
  2. Easterling v. Woodward Lumber Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. Mann v. Unity Medical Center/Health CentralSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  4. Colonial Insurance Co. of California v. Minnesota Assigned Risk PlanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
  5. Martin v. Morrison Trucking, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2011

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API