Legal Opinion

In Re the GUARDIANSHIP OF Jeffers J. TSCHUMY, Ward

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided September 17, 2014No. A12-2179PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GILDEA, Chief Justice.

The question presented in this case is whether court approval is required before a guardian who has the power to consent to necessary medical treatment for a ward under Minn.Stat. § 524.5-313(c)(4)(i) (2012), may consent to remove the ward from life-sustaining treatment when all the interested parties agree that such removal is in the ward’s best interests. The district court held that a guardian who possesses the medical-consent power under Minn.Stat. § 524.5 — B13(c)(4)(i), cannot consent to the removal of a ward’s life support without prior court approval. The…

2Cases cited103 opinions

  1. Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Cruzan Ex Rel. Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of HealthSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Holly v. AuldSupreme Court of Florida · 1984
  4. Superintendent of Belchertown State School v. SaikewiczMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  5. People Ex Rel. Wallace v. LabrenzIllinois Supreme Court · 1952

98 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Ethan Dean v. City of WinonaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
  2. In Re: Request of Lourdes A. Leon Guerrero, I Maga'Hågan Guåhan, Relative to the Validity and Enforceability of Public Law No. 20-134Supreme Court of Guam · 2023
  3. Laymon v. Minnesota Premier Properties, LLCCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
  4. Glaze v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2018
  5. Drake Snell v. Tim Walz, Governor of Minnesota, in his official capacity, ...Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2024

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API