In Re the GUARDIANSHIP OF Jeffers J. TSCHUMY, Ward
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GILDEA, Chief Justice.
The question presented in this case is whether court approval is required before a guardian who has the power to consent to necessary medical treatment for a ward under Minn.Stat. § 524.5-313(c)(4)(i) (2012), may consent to remove the ward from life-sustaining treatment when all the interested parties agree that such removal is in the ward’s best interests. The district court held that a guardian who possesses the medical-consent power under Minn.Stat. § 524.5 — B13(c)(4)(i), cannot consent to the removal of a ward’s life support without prior court approval. The…
2Cases cited103 opinions
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Cruzan Ex Rel. Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of HealthSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Holly v. AuldSupreme Court of Florida · 1984
- Superintendent of Belchertown State School v. SaikewiczMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
- People Ex Rel. Wallace v. LabrenzIllinois Supreme Court · 1952
98 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Ethan Dean v. City of WinonaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
- In Re: Request of Lourdes A. Leon Guerrero, I Maga'Hågan Guåhan, Relative to the Validity and Enforceability of Public Law No. 20-134Supreme Court of Guam · 2023
- Laymon v. Minnesota Premier Properties, LLCCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
- Glaze v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2018
- Drake Snell v. Tim Walz, Governor of Minnesota, in his official capacity, ...Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2024
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.