State v. Cherry
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BECTON, Judge.
I
Defendant first argues that the trial court should have allowed her motion to dismiss the bill of indictment. Defendant was originally charged in a Magistrate’s Order with feloniously possessing with intent to sell and deliver four grams, but less than fourteen grams, of heroin. Defendant was subsequently indicted for feloniously trafficking in heroin by possessing and transporting 4.6 grams of heroin in violation of G.S. 90-95(h)(4). The “trafficking” offense carries a greater punishment than the offense with which defendant had been originally charged. Defendant contends that…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- State v. CameronSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- State v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
- State v. KetchieSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- State v. MillsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
- State v. PerryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
- State v. WillisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984