Legal Opinion

State v. Mills

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 5, 1978No. 7822SC640PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MITCHELL, Judge.

The defendant first assigns as error the admission of the testimony of two officers that the breathalyzer was administered to the defendant at 1:05 p.m. when the written breathalyzer record indicated that it was administered at 12:15 p.m. The defendant contends that this violated the best evidence rule. We do not agree.

The best evidence rule indicates that a writing is the best evidence of its contents. The rule does not apply “to writings when their contents are not in question or when they are only ‘collateral’ to the issues in the case.” 2 Stansbury, N.C. Evidence (Brandis…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. FoxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  2. State v. VirgilSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  3. State v. SneedenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  4. State v. BranchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  5. State v. CornellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. WallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  2. State v. HardingCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
  3. State v. AllenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  4. State v. RutherfordCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  5. State v. SiskCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API