Legal Opinion
State v. Finley
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided May 28, 1954No. 36,290PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Frank T. Gallagher, Justice.
Appeal from an order of the municipal court denying defendant’s motion for a new trial.
' The facts are undisputed. Defendant is a refrigeration installer who holds a certificate of competency as a master refrigeration installer issued by the city of Minneapolis pursuant to the refrigeration systems ordinance. Minneapolis City Charter and Ordinances (Perm, ed.) 3:17-1 reads:
“No person, firm or corporation shall hereafter construct, install, alter, repair or service any refrigeration system or equipment in any building or structure within the City of Minneapolis, or…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Earn Line S. S. Co. v. Sutherland S. S. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1920
- State Ex Rel. Bennett v. BonnerMontana Supreme Court · 1950
- State v. EndSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- Scully v. HallihanIllinois Supreme Court · 1936
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- City of St. Paul v. DalsinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
- Camacho v. Todd and Leiser HomesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
- Blue Earth County Pork Producers, Inc. v. County of Blue EarthCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
- In Re Public Conservatorship of FosterCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
- Fletcher Properties, Inc. v. City of Minneapolis, Poverty & Race Research Action ...Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024