Legal Opinion

Scully v. Hallihan

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided December 10, 1936No. 23773. Reversed and remandedPublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Herrick

The circuit court of Cook county sustained the defendant’s motion to strike (in the nature of a demurrer) the amended complaint filed May 12, 1936, by the plaintiffs Scully, Scalzitti, Centrocchio and DelMonaco, against John J. Hallihan, as director of the Department of Education and Registration, to enjoin the enforcement against them of the act in relation to the regulation of plumbing, hereinafter called the “act of 1935.” (State Bar Stat. 1935, chap. 109a, p. 2425-2431.) The plaintiffs abided. Their amended complaint was dismissed for the want of equity. They bring the record here.

The…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Pierce v. Society of SistersSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. Allgeyer v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  4. Western Theological Seminary v. City of EvanstonIllinois Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Wedesweiler v. BrundageIllinois Supreme Court · 1921

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. United States v. MeyerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1940
  2. Chicago Title Insurance Co. v. HuffSupreme Court of Iowa · 1977
  3. Ohio Oil Co. v. WrightIllinois Supreme Court · 1944
  4. People Ex Rel. Holland Coal Co. v. IsaacsIllinois Supreme Court · 1961
  5. People v. BrownIllinois Supreme Court · 1950

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API