Legal Opinion
Camacho v. Todd and Leiser Homes
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided December 20, 2005No. A04-599PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PAGE, Justice.
This case involves an issue of statutory construction arising from the dissolution of an incorporated residential building contractor. Appellants Arturo and Kristi Camacho (the Camachos) brought suit against respondent Todd and Leiser Homes, Inc. (TLH), a dissolved corporation, for negligence and breach of construction warranties under Minn.Stat. § 327A.02, subd. 1(c) (2004). 1 TLH moved to dismiss, claiming that the corporate dissolution statute, Minn.Stat. § 302A.7291, subd. 3(a) (2004), barred the Camachos’ claims. 2 The district court denied TLH’s motion. TLH appealed…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Hoang Minh Ly v. NystromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- Hodder v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Sartori v. Harnischfeger Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Morris v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Church of the Nativity of Our Lord v. WatPro, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Capco of Summerville, Inc. v. J.H. Gayle Construction Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
- Reiter v. KiffmeyerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- Lewis v. RussellDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2012
- State v. KuhlmanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
- Continental Casualty Co. v. National Union Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.