Legal Opinion

In Re Public Conservatorship of Foster

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided October 10, 1995No. C4-95-118, C6-95-119PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HAROLD W. SCHULTZ, Judge.

A petition was filed to appoint the Commissioner of Human Services as public conservator of Holly Foster. The petitioner later moved that the Commissioner be given the specific power to consent to neuroleptic medication on Foster’s behalf. The district court appointed the Commissioner as public conservator and granted general conserva-torship powers, but denied the Commissioner the power to consent to neuroleptic medication. The Commissioner of Human Services and Hennepin County appeal. The Minnesota Association for Guardianship and Conservatorship and the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  3. Fabio v. BellomoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
  4. Matter of BlilieSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
  5. Price v. SheppardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. KeetonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
  2. In Re MedworthCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API