Employment Security Commission v. General Motors Corp.
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
*644J. H. Gillis, P. J.
This is an appeal from a decision of the Genesee county circuit court,1 where it was held that a back-to-work payment under § 27 (c)(2) of the Michigan Employment Security Act, MOLA § 421.27(c)(2) (Stat Ann 1968 Rev § 17.529 [c] [2]), is due a claimant whose termination from employment resulted from “unsatisfactory job performance.”
Briefly, the undisputed facts are that, after two years of employment with Chevrolet Division of General Motors Corporation, Richard W. Foster’s employment was terminated for “unsatisfactory job performance” on February 29, 1968. He filed for,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Hearst Publications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Fishgold v. Sullivan Drydock & Repair Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Ford Motor Co. v. Unemployment Compensation CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1947
- Peaden v. Employment Security CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
- Great Lakes Steel Corp. v. Employment Security CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1968
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- General Motors Corp. v. ErvesMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
- Chrysler Corp. v. WashingtonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974
- General Motors Corp. v. ErvesMichigan Supreme Court · 1975
- Herman v. Power Maintenance & Constructors, LLC.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2009
- General Motors Corp. v. ErvesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.