Legal Opinion
General Motors Corp. v. Erves
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided December 18, 1975No. Docket Nos. 55138-55141, (Calendar Nos. 6, 7)PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtM. S. Coleman, J.
Plaintiff, General Motors Corporation, appeals a judgment of the circuit court ordering payment of back-to-work benefits to five individual defendants. The Court of Appeals reversed as to the claims of Bloomer, Kartsonas and Erves and affirmed as to the claims of Lawson and Griffith.
In each case, the controlling statute is MCLA 421.27(c)(2); MSA 17.529(c)(2), which provides:
"(2) When an individual has had a period of unemployment: (i) for which he has been paid benefits for 1 or more weeks or has received a credit for a waiting week, (ii) which commenced with a layoff by an employing unit…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Advisory Opinion Re Constitutionality of 1972 PA 294Michigan Supreme Court · 1973
- Melia v. Employment Security CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
- United States v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Dussia v. MONROE CTY. EMP. RET. SYS.Michigan Supreme Court · 1971
- Dussia v. Monroe County Employees Retirement SystemMichigan Supreme Court · 1971
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Rovas v. SBC MichiganMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
- In Re Complaint of Rovas Against SbcMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
- Miller Bros. v. Public Service CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989
- Ford Motor Co. v. JacksonMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
- People v. BoydMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.