Legal Opinion

Peaden v. Employment Security Commission

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 13, 1959No. Docket 32, Calendar 47,676PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBlack, J.

Plaintiff-claimants were and are employees of defendant Calumet Division — Calumet & Hecla, Inc. They applied for unemployment benefits under the Michigan employment security act, alleging (as the issue comes here) eligibility for such benefits starting as of August 12, 1955, and continuing through September 10, 1955. The commission and hearing referee upheld claimants and directed payment accordingly. The appeal board, sitting in review, reversed these rulings and, by way of conclusion of its lengthy findings, ruled as follows:

*615“It is held that the claiments were unemployed because of a work…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. National Labor Relations Board v. Hearst Publications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Unemployment Compensation Comm'n of Alaska v. AragonSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. National Labor Relations Board v. Denver Building & Construction Trades CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  4. Northern Securities Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  5. Rochester Telephone Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Autio v. Proksch Construction Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Linski v. Employment Security CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Wickey v. Employment Security CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Miller v. F. W. Woolworth Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Sterling Secret Service, Inc. v. Department of State PoliceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API