General Motors Corp. v. Erves
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtLevin, P. J.
Plaintiff, General Motors Corporation, appeals a judgment of the circuit court ordering payment of "back-to-work” benefits to the five individual defendants. We affirm as to defendants *593Lawson and Griffith and reverse as to defendants Bloomer, Kartsonas, and Erves.
All five individual defendants were employed by General Motors Corporation, Cadillac Car Division. All were laid off during the annual model changeover period in the summer of 1968.
(I) Bloomer and Kartsonas received their layoff notices at the end of their shift on Friday, August 2, 1968. They returned to work three weeks and two…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Klat v. Chrysler Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1938
- England v. &198tna Life Ins. Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1938
- Employment Security Commission v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1971
- Klym v. Aetna Life Ins. Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1943
3Cited by8 opinions
- General Motors Corp. v. ErvesMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
- General Motors Corp. v. ErvesMichigan Supreme Court · 1975
- Koziol v. Kelvinator, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1974
- Chrysler Corp. v. WashingtonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974
- Chrysler Corp. v. WashingtonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.