Legal Opinion

Caison Ex Rel. Caison v. Nationwide Insurance

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 2, 1978No. 775DC335PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MITCHELL, Judge.

The defendant first assigns as error the trial court’s entry of summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff. The defendant contends that the issue of permissive use constitutes a material issue of fact between the parties which made the entry of summary judgment inappropriate.

The defendant argues that its policy of insurance issued to Babson, with policy limits of $25,000 coverage for each person involved in an accident, provided coverage “in excess of and in addition to” the $10,000 coverage required by the Act. To the extent that such coverage exceeded or added to the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hyde Insurance Agency, Inc. v. Dixie Leasing Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
  2. Younts v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  3. Jernigan v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
  4. Packer v. Travelers InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
  5. Knight v. Duke Power Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  2. Roseboro Ford, Inc. v. BassCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  3. Guaranty National Insurance v. Kemper Financial ServicesDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1987
  4. Shook v. State Farm Mut. Ins. of Bloomington, Ill.District Court, D. Montana · 1994
  5. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. YountsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API