Legal Opinion

Shook v. State Farm Mut. Ins. of Bloomington, Ill.

District Court, D. Montana

Decided September 6, 1994No. CV-92-154-GFPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

HATFIELD, Chief Judge.

This declaratory judgment action places in issue both the validity of, and the interpretation to be afforded a “household exclusion” contained in an automobile liability policy issued by the defendant, State Farm Mutual Insurance Company, to Terry Evan Shook and Lois Jean Shook, husband and wife. State Farm has presented the court with a motion, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6), re questing the court to declare the exclusion valid and dismiss the action upon the ground it fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. The motion is…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Sparks v. Republic National Life InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Transamerica Insurance v. RoyleMontana Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Hughes v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
  4. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. WilsonArizona Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Gordinier v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1987

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Max True Plastering Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
  2. Leibrand v. National Farmers Union Property & Casualty Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1995
  3. American Family Mutual Insurance v. LivengoodMontana Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Forsman v. United Financial Casualty Co.District Court, D. Montana · 2013
  5. Cramer v. Farmers Ins. Exch.Montana Supreme Court · 2018

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API