Legal Opinion

Jernigan v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 30, 1972No. 7211DC415PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEDRICK, Judge.

The defendant Lumbermen’s assigns as error the denial of its motion for summary judgment as to plaintiffs’ claims and as to the cross claim of the defendant State Farm. “(T)he movant is allowed to preserve his exception to the denial of the motion for consideration on appeal from the final judgment.” The question thus presented on appeal is whether the pleadings and stipulations of the parties show there is a genuine issue as to any material fact and whether any party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. G.S. 1A-1, Rule 56.

“Evidence which may be considered under Rule 56…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kessing v. National Mortgage CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. Hawley v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Caison Ex Rel. Caison v. Nationwide InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  2. Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. ChantosCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
  3. Belasco v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  4. Packer v. Travelers InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
  5. Stanley v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API