Legal Opinion

Natural Soda Products Co. v. City of Los Angeles

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 26, 1952No. Civ. 14700PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNourse, P. J.

This ease revolves around a flooding of Owens Lake during the period December, 1937, to April, 1939. A previous action was brought by plaintiff as a result of a similar flooding in early 1937, in which case the Supreme Court considered the relationship of defendants’ Owens Valley aqueduct system and Owens Lake. (Natural Soda Prod. Co. v. City of Los Angeles, 23 Cal.2d 193 [143 P.2d 12].) The physical situation in this case is the same as there presented.

In 1913 the defendants completed their aqueduct to Owens Valley and, from 1919 to 1937, diverted into it virtually all the flow of the Owens…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Vallejo & Northern R.R. v. Reed Orchard Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Natural Soda Products Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Perkins v. Sunset Tel. and Tel. Co.California Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Arais v. KalensnikoffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  5. In Re Estate of HigginsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Albertson v. RaboffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Nevarov v. CaldwellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  3. Zevnik v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  4. Bleeck v. State Board of OptometryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  5. Sherol Diruzza, AKA Sherl Janc v. County of Tehama Robert Heard Jerry FloydCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API