Legal Opinion
Bleeck v. State Board of Optometry
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 24, 1971No. Civ. 36707PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HERNDON, J.
Appellants are the State Board of Optometry, generally referred to herein as the “Board,” its individual members and its executive secretary. Respondent is an optometrist duly licensed to practice his profession in the State of California. On and prior to October 1, 1959, respondent was licensed to operate some 36 branch offices.
Statement of the Case
The judgment from which this appeal is taken orders the issuance of a writ of mandate by the terms of which- the Board is directed within the time specified therein to transfer each of 29 “inactive” branch office licenses for the…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Abelleira v. District Court of AppealCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Albertson v. RaboffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- United States v. Stone & Downer Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Rich v. State Board of OptometryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Price v. Sixth District Agricultural Assn.California Supreme Court · 1927
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Coachella Valley Mosquito & Vector Control District v. California Public Employment Relations BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
- People v. CrowsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
- Wimsatt v. Beverly Hills Weight Loss Clinics International, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1995
- Border Business Park, Inc. v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Wilson v. Interlake Steel Co.California Supreme Court · 1982
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.