Legal Opinion

In Re Estate of Higgins

California Supreme Court

Decided September 8, 1909No. L.A. No. 2411PublishedCited by 64 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Edwin H. Lamme, Puterbaugh & Puterbaugh, and H. E. Doolittle, for Appellants.

1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.

Thomas J. Higgins, a resident of the county of San Diego, died in said county on the fifth day of September, 1907. He left as his heirs his widow, Phoeb.e B. Higgins, a ' daughter, Cornelia B. Chick, and two sons, Albert E. Higgins and Herbert R. Higgins. A paper, purporting to be the will of the decedent, was offered for probate by Herbert R. Higgins, and written opposition thereto filed by Albert E. Higgins and Cornelia B. Chick. Two grounds of contest—unsoundness of mind and undue influence exerted by Herbert R Higgins— were set up by the contestants. The proponent having filed an answer,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. In re Estate of McDevittCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Coghill v. KennedySupreme Court of Alabama · 1898
  3. De La Cuesta v. CalkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Wilson v. McConnachieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Brumagim v. BradshawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by64 opinions

  1. Estate of CasparCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Jenkins v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Estate of BairdCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  4. In Re Estate of RelphCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Estate of ShayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API