Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Daniels

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 23, 2009No. 410 CAP, 411 CAP, 413 CAP, and 414 CAPPublishedCited by 288 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Chief Justice CASTILLE.*

The Commonwealth appeals from the order of the Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas granting appellees Henry Daniels and Kevin Pelzer relief on their petitions under the Post Conviction Relief Act (“PCRA”), 42 Pa.C.S. §§ 9541-9546. By order dated March 25, 2003, the PCRA court granted both appellees relief on two claims, ordered a new trial, and denied the remaining claims. Appellees, acting as Cross-Appellants, have filed cross-appeals renewing the issues that the PCRA court dismissed. For the reasons set forth below, we vacate the order of the PCRA court…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  3. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Commonwealth v. PierceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. Commonwealth v. GrantSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by288 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. SpotzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Commonwealth v. KoehlerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  3. Commonwealth v. LeskoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  4. Commonwealth v. SneedSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  5. Commonwealth v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013

283 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API