Legal Opinion

Repo v. CAPITOL ELEVATOR CO., DIV. OF IMC

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 18, 1977No. 46386, 46511PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MacLaughlin, Justice.

Oscar Repo, plaintiff-employee, appeals from a district court judgment in favor of Prudential Insurance Company (Prudential) in an action to recover disability benefits allegedly due to Repo under a group sickness and accident policy. Repo also seeks review by certiorari of an order of the Workers’ Compensation; Board (now Worker’s Compensation Court of Appeals) awarding Prudential, as intervenor, a portion of Repo’s workers’ compensation settlement with his employer,. Capitol Elevator Company (Capitol). The matters were consolidated for hearing before this court. For…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lemmer v. Batzli Electric Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
  2. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States v. BachrachSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
  3. Tatro v. Hartmann's StoreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Kaiman v. Mercy Midlands Medical & Dental PlanNebraska Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. Johnson v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  3. Roraff v. State, Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  4. Neuberger v. Hennepin County WorkhouseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  5. Brooks v. A. M. F., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API