Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Minnesota

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 21, 1983No. 82-563PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMONETT, Justice.

An attorney who successfully represented an employee client on a workers’ compensation claim here seeks attorney fees for his services which enabled the health carrier to obtain reimbursement of its medical expenses. The trial court dismissed the attorney’s suit. We affirm.

Appellant-plaintiff Roger A. Johnson, an attorney, was retained by an employee to pursue her claim for workers’ compensation. The case was a difficult one, involving many serious issues and requiring seven medical depositions. Nonetheless, Mr. Johnson was successful. Compensation Judge P. Nadine James…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. McArdle v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
  2. Dusenka v. DusenkaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
  3. Roraff v. State, Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  4. Blazek v. North American Life & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
  5. Brooks v. A. M. F., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Boline v. DotyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  2. Kaiman v. Mercy Midlands Medical & Dental PlanNebraska Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. Thomas A. Foster & Associates, Ltd. v. PaulsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005
  4. Williams v. Dow Chemical Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  5. Edquist v. Browning-FerrisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API