Legal Opinion
Arthur D. Roebuck v. R. James Nicholson
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims
Decided August 22, 2006No. 03-2009PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HAGEL, Judge:
In this appeal, we address questions that arise regarding the date when the 120-day jurisdictional appeal period begins in circumstances in which the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (Board) bifurcates a claim and issues more than one decision pertaining to that claim. On December 11, 2002, the Board denied Mr. Roebuck service connection for a lung disorder under a nicotine dependence theory and stated that it would “prepare a separate decision addressing [the] issue” of service connection for a lung disorder under an asbestos exposure theory. Record (R.) at 1060. On October 28, 2003,…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Gilbert v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1990
- Schafrath v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1991
- Adway Maggitt, Jr., Claimant-Appellant v. Togo D. West, Jr., Secretary of Veterans AffairsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
- James R. Cook, Claimant-Appellant v. Anthony J. Principi, Secretary of Veterans AffairsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- EF v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1991
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Robinson v. MansfieldUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2008
- Larry G. Tyrues v. Eric K. ShinsekiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2009
- Joseph C. Hillyard v. Eric K. ShinsekiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2011
- John T. King v. Eric K. ShinsekiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2014
- Santiago M. Juarez v. James B. PeakeUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2008
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.