Legal Opinion

State v. Powell

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 4, 1953No. 362PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJoimsoN, J.

Tbe Attorney-General moves to affirm tbe judgment and dismiss tbe appeal for failure to include in tbe case on appeal a narrative statement of tbe evidence as required by Rule 19 (4), Rules of Practice in'the Supreme Court, 221 N.C. 544, p. 556.

Tbis Rule requires that tbe evidence “shall be in narrative form, ’and not by question and answer, except that a question and answer, or a series of them, may be set out when tbe subject of a particular exception.” The Rule further provides that “If tbe case is settled by agreement of counsel, or tbe statement of tbe appellant becomes the case on…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pruitt v. WoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  2. Pruitt v. . WoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  3. Anderson v. Wray Plumbing & Heating Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  4. In Re De FebioSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  5. First National Bank v. FriesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. GriffinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  2. State v. BestSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  3. State v. PrinceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  4. State v. AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  5. State v. McNeillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API