First National Bank v. Fries
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Per CueiaM.
This is a motion to reinstate an appeal wbicb was dismissed at this term for failure to state tbe evidence in narrative form, and for other irregularities appearing in tbe record.
Tbe principal reason urged in support of tbe motion is tbat counsel for appellee agreed to tbe case on appeal; but this also appeared in Cressler v. Asheville, 138 N. C., 483; and in Bucken v. R. R., 157 N. C., 444, and while tbe appeals in those cases were not dismissed, it was stated in effect tbat counsel could not waive compliance with tbe rule, and tbat it would be enforced.
The motion must, therefore,…
2Cited by4 opinions
- State v. PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- Rogers v. City of AshevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
- State v. McNeillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- Huie v. TempletonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957