Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Wray Plumbing & Heating Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 12, 1953No. 670PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

When an appeal is taken from the Industrial Commis- ■ sion to the Superior Court the statute, G.S. 97-86, requires that a certified transcript of the record before the Commission be filed in the Superior Court. This necessarily carries to the Superior Court a transcript of the evidence in question and answer form as transcribed from the reporter’s notes.

However, on appeal from the Superior Court, the procedure must be in accordance with the Rules of Practice in the Supreme Court. 221 N.C. 544 et seq. And Rule 19 (4), (p. 556), requires that the evidence “shall be in narrative form, and not by…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Pruitt v. WoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  2. Pruitt v. . WoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  3. Casey v. East Carolina RailwaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  4. In Re De FebioSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  5. Rhoades v. . AshevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Penland v. BIRD COAL COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  2. Suits v. Old Equity Life Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  3. State v. PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  4. Tillis v. Calvine Cotton Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  5. State v. McNeillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API