Legal Opinion

State v. Allen

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 9, 1973No. 70PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOORE, Justice.

Defendant’s assignments of error all relate to matters wherein defendant claims the presiding judge unfairly commented on the evidence or otherwise made prejudicial remarks, contrary to the provisions of G.S. 1-180.

In considering these assignments, we apply the following general principles. This statute imposes on the trial judge the duty of absolute impartiality. Nowell v. Neal, 249 N.C. 516, 107 S.E. 2d 107 (1959). It forbids the judge to intimate his opinion in any form whatever, “it being the intent of the law to insure to each and every litigant a fair and impartial trial…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. State v. McWilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. State v. CarterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  3. State v. BelkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  4. State v. NorrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  5. State v. CauleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  2. State v. LarrimoreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1995
  3. State v. SladeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  4. State v. EveretteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  5. State v. TheerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API