Legal Opinion

State v. McNeill

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 17, 1954No. 217PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

Tbe ease was settled by agreement of counsel. All tbe evidence in tbe case is by question and answer, and not in narrative form, and therefore does not comply with Rule 19 (4), Rules of Practice in tbe Supreme Court, 221 N.C. 544, p. 556.

This Rule is mandatory, and may not be waived by tbe parties. S. v. Powell, 238 N.C. 550, 78 S.E. 2d 248; Casey v. R. R., 198 N.C. 432, 152 S.E. 38; Bank v. Fries, 162 N.C. 516, 77 S.E. 678. See also Pruitt v. Wood, 199 N.C. 788, 156 S.E. 126.

This mandatory Rule will be enforced by this Court ex mero motu. Anderson v. Heating Co., 238 N.C. 138, 76 S.E. 2d…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Pruitt v. WoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  2. Pruitt v. . WoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  3. State v. PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  4. State v. PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  5. Anderson v. Wray Plumbing & Heating Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. GriffinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  2. State v. BestSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  3. Whiteside v. Ralston Purina Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  4. Huie v. TempletonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  5. Lowry v. DillinghamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API