Legal Opinion
United States v. Kelly
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided November 18, 2011No. 09-2607PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOWARD, Circuit Judge.
This case involves assessment of whether an appearance compelled by a writ of habeas corpus ad prosequendum by one federal district court to the custodian of an individual detained in another federal district on the basis of unrelated pending charges triggers the Speedy Trial Act’s (STA) 30-day arrest to indictment clock with respect to the charges in the jurisdiction that issued the writ. This appears to be a question of first impression. We hold that the STA was not triggered and affirm the decision of the district court denying the motion to dismiss the indictment for…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- United States v. MauroSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Ex Parte Bollman and SwartwoutSupreme Court of the United States · 1807
- Carbo v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Rashad v. WalshCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Robert Vaughn EvansCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1998
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- United States v. Melvin KnightCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016
- Sun Capital Partners III, LP v. New England Teamsters & Trucking Industry Pension FundCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013
- United States v. LewisCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013
- Robert Thomas v. P Warden, Federal Correctional Institution, Berlin, New HampshireDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2022
- United States of America v. P Nathan CraigueDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2021
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.