Legal Opinion
United States of America v. P Nathan Craigue
District Court, D. New Hampshire
Decided March 28, 2021No. 19-cr-142-LMPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE United States of America v. Criminal No. 19-cr-142-LM Opinion No.
2021 DNH 160
P Nathan Craigue ORDER In this false statement case, the government brought a superseding indictment against defendant Nathan Craigue on the eve of trial, thereby requiring Craigue to seek a last-minute continuance. See doc. no. 78. The superseding indictment contains no new factual allegations. It alleges no new crimes. It is based on information previously available to the government. The government admits that it superseded for one reason: to avoid the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Bordenkircher v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. LovascoSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. DardenSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Henderson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Rafael Santana and Francis FuentesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States of America v. Crim. P David BerardDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2023