Legal Opinion
Ohio Confection Co. v. Eimon Mercantile Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided February 2, 1923No. 23,225PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Lees, C.
Action in the municipal court of the city of Duluth to recover the purchase price of candy ordered by defendant from plaintiff. Plaintiff is a manufacturer of candy at Cleveland, Ohio. Defendant is a grocer at Superior, Wisconsin. On May 4, 1920, C. M. Haugner, then in charge of defendant’s confectionery department, gave the order to Barney Sands, one of plaintiff’s traveling salesmen. Sands wrote the order and left a copy with Haugner. It contained these words: “How ship: Boat. When: At once.” A portion of the order wms filled on June 18 and is not here involved. *422The remainder of the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Parsons, Rich & Co. v. LaneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
- Kubu v. KabesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
- Gary Realty Co. v. KellySupreme Court of Missouri · 1919
- Henry v. HutchinsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
- Welsbach Street Lighting Co. v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. Sun Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1951
- Blankholm v. FearingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
- United States ex rel. Farwell, Ozmun, Kirk & Co. v. Shea-Adamson Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1937
- Voelker v. JosephWashington Supreme Court · 1963
- Digital Resource v. Abacor, Inc. (In Re Digital Resource, LLC)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.