Legal Opinion
Voelker v. Joseph
Washington Supreme Court
Decided June 27, 1963No. 36154PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRosellini, J.
In this action, an apple grower sought to recover a balance allegedly due on two contracts for the sale of apples to a dealer in Yakima. The dealer claimed that he had suffered losses on sales to purchasers outside this state because the apples, which had been packed, stored, and shipped by the grower, had arrived in a defective condition. A jury verdict was returned in favor of the dealer on May 4, 1961.
It is the first contention of the appellant that the respondents are not in a position to claim an offset, assuming that the apples were delivered in a damaged condition, because the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Titus v. . Glens Falls Insurance CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
- Kessinger v. AndersonWashington Supreme Court · 1948
- Dunbar v. Farnum WifeSupreme Court of Vermont · 1937
- Colgate v. United States Leather Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1907
- Kahn v. Bancamerica-Blair Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Romjue v. FairchildCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1991
- TMT Bear Creek Shopping Center, Inc. v. Petco Animal Supplies, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2007
- WHITE PASS. CO. v. St. JohnWashington Supreme Court · 1967
- Gorge Lumber Co. v. Brazier Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1972
- Jones v. MaestasIdaho Court of Appeals · 1985
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.