Legal Opinion
United States ex rel. Farwell, Ozmun, Kirk & Co. v. Shea-Adamson Co.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided December 18, 1937No. 3712PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SULLIVAN, District Judge.
This is an action by the United States of America, for the Use and Benefit of Farwell, Ozmun, Kirk & Co., a corporation, against Shea-Adamson Company, a corporation, Nils P. Severin and Alfred N. Severin, copartners doing business under the name and style of N. P. Severin Company, and .Royal Indemnity Company, a corporation, under the provisions of the Heard Act, 40 U.S.C.A. § 270.
This suit is brought by the plaintiff materialman to recover the unpaid balance on certain materials furnished to the SheaAdamson Company, the subcontractor, in the performance of its…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- United States v. BehanSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Kauffman v. RaederCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1901
- American Surety Co. v. Lawrenceville Cement Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Maine · 1901
- Mining Co. v. CullinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Bentley v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Susi Contracting Co. v. Zara Contracting Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
- National State Bank of Newark v. Terminal Const. Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1963
- Moyer v. United States, for Use of Trane Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1953
- United States ex rel. Olson v. W.H. Cates Construction Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
- Golden West Construction Co. v. United States ex rel. BernadotCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1962
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.