Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Blankholm v. Fearing

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 17, 1946No. Nos. 34,262, 34,263PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Christianson, Justice.

Orders to show cause why peremptory writs of mandamus should not issue directing the district court of Stearns county and the judge thereof to change the venue of these cases from Stearns county to Hennepin county.

Both of these actions, commenced on January 17, 1946, in Henne-pin county by plaintiffs, who are husband and wife, are for damages allegedly suffered by them in an automobile collision occurring in Hennepin county on May 13, 1945. The collision took place between an automobile owned and operated by plaintiff George Blankholm, in which Blanche Blankholm was a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Clark v. DyeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  2. Kubu v. KabesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
  3. Ohio Confection Co. v. Eimon Mercantile Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
  4. Spicer v. StebbinsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  5. Fiterman v. J. N. Johnson & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1923

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Montgomery Ward & Co. v. County of HennepinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  2. Dolder v. GriffinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  3. S.M. Hentges & Sons, Inc. v. MensingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  4. Hansen v. Robert Half International, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
  5. LaBere v. PalmerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API