Rourke v. Troy
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
NOTT, J.
I
This appeal follows the trial court’s denial of an application for order of sale of a dwelling filed by plaintiffs and appellants, judgment creditors who sought to enforce judgments against defendant and appellant Nick Troy by having his residence sold. Concluding that appellants could not obtain a minimum bid under Code of Civil Procedure section 704.800, 1 the trial court denied the application. Our interpretation of the statute does not lead to the same conclusion, and we disapprove of its reasoning on that point. As explained below, the application should have been denied…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- California Teachers Ass'n v. San Diego Community College DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
- California Manufacturers Ass'n v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Hutnick v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.California Supreme Court · 1988
- Brown v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- Khan v. Medical BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Fidelity National Title Insurance v. SchroederCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Amin v. KhazindarCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- Mehrtash v. MehrtashCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Bratcher v. BucknerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Moldo v. Charnock (In Re Charnock)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.