Legal Opinion

Fidelity National Title Insurance v. Schroeder

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 24, 2009No. F056339PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KANE, J.

On learning that plaintiff Fidelity National Title Insurance Company (Fidelity) was about to file an abstract of judgment as a lien against his real property, defendant Gordon Schroeder (Gordon) deeded his interest in a Fresno home that he co-owned with defendant Toni Richardson, also known as Toni Schroeder (Toni), over to Toni. The trial court found that Gordon intended to defraud Fidelity, but the transfer was not set aside under the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act (UFTA; Civ. Code, § 3439 et seq.) because no recoverable value remained in the real property after deducting…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Ghirardo v. AntonioliCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Roberts v. City of PalmdaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Mejia v. ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Fladeboe v. American Isuzu Motors Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2007
  5. Reyes v. KoshaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Pga W. Residential Ass'n, Inc. v. Hulven Int'l, Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  2. Casterline v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
  3. Opperman v. Path, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2014
  4. Whitmire v. Ingersoll-Rand Co.California Court of Appeal · 2010
  5. Rountree v. Nunnery (In Re Rountree)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 2011

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API