Legal Opinion

Brown v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 1984No. S.F. 24753PublishedCited by 103 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BIRD, C. J.

Do the special venue provisions of the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) (Gov. Code, § 12965, subd. (b)) control over the general venue provisions of Code of Civil Procedure section 395, subdivision (a) where both FEHA and non-FEHA causes of action are alleged?

I

Petitioners, Andrew Brown, Charles Jones and Sam George, were employed by real parties in interest, C.C. Myers, Inc., other corporate entities and several individuals (hereafter defendants), on a highway construction project in Alameda County. Defendants allegedly discriminated against and *481ultimately…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Moyer v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Select Base Materials, Inc. v. Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Alcorn v. Anbro Engineering, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Agarwal v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  5. People v. GilbertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by103 opinions

  1. Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Rojo v. KligerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Johnson v. City of Loma LindaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  4. People v. CruzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Aguilar v. Avis Rent a Car System, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1999

98 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API