Moldo v. Charnock (In Re Charnock)
United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MONTALI, Bankruptcy Judge.
Judicial hen holder and appellant Byron Z. Moldo (“Creditor”) appeals from the bankruptcy court’s order avoiding his judicial hen under Section 522(f). 2 Creditor argues that his hen should not be avoided because it is senior to a subsequent consensual hen, which has not been avoided. We disagree. Senior as well as junior judicial hens are avoidable under the plain meaning of the statute. We are not persuaded that this result is either absurd or contrary to Congress’ intent, as Creditor argues. Accordingly, we AFFIRM.
I. FACTS
The relevant facts are undisputed.…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Butner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Owen v. OwenSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- United States v. Rosario Montoya, United States of America v. Filiberto E. MontoyaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- In the Matter of E.C. Henderson and Phyllis Henderson, Debtors. E.C. Henderson and Phyllis Henderson v. Lee BelknapCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Trahan v. Day Kimball Hospital (In Re Trahan)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 2006
- Milgard Tempering, Inc. v. Darosa (In Re Darosa)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Andreas AbramsonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. California · 2019
- In Re GilmerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2009