Legal Opinion
Candini v. Hiatt
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 1, 1935No. Civ. 5326PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.
The defendant has appealed from a judgment for damages which was rendered against him for wilful misconduct in the operation of his automobile resulting in injuries sustained by a guest who was riding with him.
It is contended the evidence fails to show that the defendant was guilty of wilful misconduct and that the court erred in giving and refusing certain instructions.
There is a conflict of evidence, but we are of the opinion the implied findings and judgment are adequately supported by the record with respect to proof of wilful misconduct on the part of the defendant. Neither the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Burns's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
- Howard v. HowardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Helme v. Great Western Milling Co.California Court of Appeal · 1919
- Cook v. ColeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
- Norton v. PuterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Porter v. HofmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- Parsons v. FullerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- People v. PryorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- People v. NowellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Rawlins v. LoryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.