Legal Opinion

Hill v. Hoig

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided November 26, 2003No. Docket 240553PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCooper, J.

Following a jury trial, the trial court awarded plaintiff Lillian Hill $8,000, plus costs, for injuries that she sustained from a poodle dog belonging to defendants Donald and Marge Hoig. Defendant appeals as of right. We affirm. This appeal is being decided without oral argument pursuant to MCR 7.214(E).

Plaintiff was walking on the sidewalk when she witnessed a truck hit defendants’ dog. The dog was lying in the middle of the road and plaintiff decided to move him to safety. In the process of moving the dog, plaintiff sustained a bite on her right hand. Defendants asserted that their dog did…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Placek v. City of Sterling HeightsMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Lugo v. Ameritech Corp., Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Case v. Consumers Power Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Cox v. Flint Board of Hospital ManagersMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Chapdelaine v. SochockiMichigan Court of Appeals · 2001

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hill v. HoigMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. In re PilandMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018
  3. Joseph Wier v. Allstate Insurance CompanyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018
  4. Matthew Migdalewicz v. Perry D HollieMichigan Court of Appeals · 2020
  5. Megan Parks v. Darrell Ray ParksMichigan Court of Appeals · 2019

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API