Legal Opinion

Hill v. Hoig

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided November 26, 2003No. Docket 240553Published

1Opinion of the Court

672 N.W.2d 531 (2003)

258 Mich. App. 538

Lillian HILL, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

Donald HOIG and Marge Hoig, Defendants-Appellants.

Docket No. 240553.

Court of Appeals of Michigan.

Submitted September 9, 2003, at Lansing.

Decided September 23, 2003, at 9:10 a.m.

Released for Publication November 26, 2003.

Hohauser Law Firm (by Michael S. Hohauser), Troy, for the plaintiff.

Stertz & Weaver, P.C. (by H. William Stertz, Jr.), Saginaw, for the defendants.

Before: WHITBECK, C.J., and O'CONNELL and COOPER, JJ.

COOPER, J.

Following a jury trial, the trial court awarded plaintiff Lillian Hill $8,000, plus costs, for…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Placek v. City of Sterling HeightsMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Lugo v. Ameritech Corp., Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 2001
  3. O'Sullivan v. ShawMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
  4. Case v. Consumers Power Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Cox v. Flint Board of Hospital ManagersMichigan Supreme Court · 2002

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API