Case v. Consumers Power Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtYoung, J.
We granted leave in this case to address the proper standard of care applicable to providers of electricity in stray voltage cases. We conclude that the general standard of care is always “reasonable care,” and it is for the jury to determine whether the defendant’s conduct in a given case fell below that standard.
In this case, the trial court instructed the jury that electricity is inherently dangerous and, therefore, that defendant was required to inspect and repair its electrical lines. Because the instruction imposed an obligation to inspect and repair, it was improper. Further, we cannot…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Grand Trunk Railway Co. v. IvesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Skinner v. Square D Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1994
- Moning v. AlfonoMichigan Supreme Court · 1977
- Detroit & Milwaukee Railroad v. Van SteinburgMichigan Supreme Court · 1868
- Schultz v. Consumers Power Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1993
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by140 opinions
- Lewis v. LeGrowMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
- Fultz v. Union-Commerce AssociatesMichigan Supreme Court · 2004
- Cox v. Flint Board of Hospital ManagersMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
- Zdrojewski v. MurphyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
- Rose v. National Auction GroupMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
135 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.