Legal Opinion
Ledezma v. a & L DRYWALL
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided March 11, 1992PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
254 N.J. Super. 613 (1992)
604 A.2d 169
VICTOR L. LEDEZMA, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT,
v.
A & L DRYWALL, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued February 18, 1992.
Decided March 11, 1992.
Before Judges R.S. COHEN, A.M. STEIN[1] and KESTIN.
Sheldon Schiffman argued the cause for appellant (Fred S. Brause, Jr., attorney; Sheldon Schiffman on the brief).
Jeanette Estremera argued the cause for respondent (Edward S. Kahn, attorney, on the brief).
The opinion of the court was delivered by KESTIN, J.S.C. (temporarily assigned).
The petitioner suffered a work related injury in…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Rova Farms Resort, Inc. v. Investors Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1974
- Perez v. Pantasote, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
- Darel v. Pennsylvania Mfrs. Ass'n Ins. Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
- Sturdivant v. General Brass & MacHine Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1971
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- DYNASTY BLDG. v. Upper Saddle RiverNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1993
- THE ESTATE OF FRANCIS P. KENNEDY VS. STUART A. ROSENBLATT, CPA (L-1921-16, ESSEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2018