Legal Opinion

Parrotta v. Hederson

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided February 1, 1944PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtQua, J.

This bill is brought against the city of Chelsea, Hederson its treasurer, and McCarthy, who has been appointed in accordance with St. 1938, c. 358, § 1 (amended by St. 1939, c. 123 ¡[see St. 1941, c. 296, § 23), custodian of its property acquired by foreclosure of tax titles and, after the 1939 amendment, of property acquired under G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 60, § 80, as amended. The object of the bill is to secure specific performance of a contract for the purchase and sale of about forty-five hundred square feet of vacant land, the buildings upon which have been torn down. The contract was entered…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Crocker v. Justices of the Superior CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
  2. Ex Parte BaldwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. Attorney General v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
  4. Cheney v. CoughlinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
  5. Brewster v. ShermanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Sears v. Treasurer & Receiver GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1951
  2. Kaplan v. BowkerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1956
  3. Joseph v. Passaic Hospital Ass'n.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
  4. Morganelli v. Building Inspector of CantonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1979
  5. Eugster v. City of SpokaneCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API