Legal Opinion

Sears v. Treasurer & Receiver General

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 3, 1951PublishedCited by 86 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtQua, C.J.

The first of these cases is a petition by eleven citizens of the Commonwealth “interested in the execution of laws” against the Treasurer and Receiver General and the commissioner of public welfare, praying for a writ of mandamus to command the respondents to refrain from paying out any money or taking any action whatever under a purported law proposed by the initiative which was voted upon favorably at the State election in November, 1950, and which would strike out c. 118A of the General Laws in its entirety and substitute therefor a new c. 118A containing many provisions substantially…

2Cases cited55 opinions

  1. Field v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Stewart v. FinkelstoneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
  3. Bowe v. Secretary of CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
  4. Attorney General v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
  5. Prince v. CrockerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1896

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by86 opinions

  1. Sullivan v. Chief Justice for Administration & Management of the Trial CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006
  2. Massachusetts Teachers Ass'n v. Secretary of the CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
  3. Bettigole v. Assessors of SpringfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1961
  4. Kaplan v. BowkerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1956
  5. Stilp v. HaferSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998

81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API