Legal Opinion

Crocker v. Justices of the Superior Court

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 2, 1911PublishedCited by 152 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRugg, J.

The petitioners were indicted for a felony. Seasonably they presented motions, suggesting that because of “ local prejudice and other causes ” they could not have an impartial trial in the county of Suffolk, and asking that the proceeding be removed to another county for trial. Thereafter, an order was entered by a judge of the Superior Court,* which as amended was as follows: “ I refuse to hear the parties on the several motions of the defendants that the court order a trial of these indictments in some county other than the county of Suffolk, believing that I have no jurisdiction to…

2Cases cited59 opinions

  1. Ex Parte HardingSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. State v. BarringtonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1906
  3. In Re WinnSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  4. Attorney General v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
  5. People v. . McLaughlinNew York Court of Appeals · 1896

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by152 opinions

  1. Pinnick v. ClearyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971
  2. Groppi v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Commonwealth v. Beneficial Finance CompanyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971
  4. Commonwealth v. JacksonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  5. Commonwealth v. Colon-CruzMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990

147 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API