Legal Opinion
City of Tulsa v. Bank of Oklahoma, N.A.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided October 11, 2011No. 109,449PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCombs, J.
PROCEDURAL AND FACTUAL BACKGROUND
T 1 On November 30, 2000, the City Council of Tulsa decided to encourage the initiation of new direct nonstop airline service to the business centers of the East and West coasts, and voted to approve a Memorandum of Understanding between the Tulsa Industrial Authority (TIA) and the City of Tulsa which would convey to the TIA certain real property known as Air Force Plant Number 3 (Property). The purpose of the transfer was to allow TIA to mortgage the Property to the Bank of Oklahoma (BOK) in support of a non-recourse loan by the Bank to TIA so that TIA could,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Carmichael v. BellerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
- MBA Commercial Construction, Inc. v. Roy J. Hannaford Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
- Board of County Commissioners v. WarramSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955
- Samuel Roberts Noble Foundation, Inc. v. VickSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
- State Ex Rel. Fent v. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Water Resources BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Hitch Enterprises, Inc. v. Cimarex Energy Co.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2012
- Dinwiddie v. Suzuki Motor of America, Inc.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2015
- RANDLE v. CITY OF TULSASupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2024
- Pope v. FultonCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2013
- Blocker v. Conocophillips Co.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2019
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.