Legal Opinion
Pope v. Fulton
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided August 23, 2013No. 110357PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRIAN JACK GOREE, Judge.
T1 Jay Pope sued his step-sister, Laura Fulton, and his step-father, John Hover, to recover his ownership interest in two vehicles. Following a non-jury trial, the court entered judgment granting Jay a one-half interest in each vehicle plus attorney fees. We affirm the judgment in favor of Jay as a correct result based on an incorrect legal theory, but we reverse the awards of an ownership interest in the vehicles, pre-judgment interest, and attorney fees as contrary to law. We remand for determination of damages for unjust enrichment.
{2 The Hover family rebuilt…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Tal v. City of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
- Sisney v. SmalleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
- City National Bank & Trust Co. of Oklahoma City v. OwensSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
- Snow v. WinnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
- City of Tulsa v. Bank of Oklahoma, N.A.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2011
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Financial Security Credit Union v. PorterUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Mexico · 2020
- Raymo v. FCA US LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2020
- WHITTINGTON v. DURANT H.M.A.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2022