State Ex Rel. Fent v. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Water Resources Board
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
OPALA, V.C.J.
{1 The dispositive issue in this taxpayers' gui tam 1 action is whether summary judgment was correctly given to defendants. We answer this question in the affirmative. Although like the Court of Civil Appeals, we affirm the trial court's ruling, we disagree with the appellate court's decision to resolve the critical issue on constitutional grounds when legal relief is available on an alternative, non-constitutional basis. We hence vacate the appellate court's opinion and affirm the summary disposition of taxpayers' claim.
[[Image here]]
ANATOMY OF LITIGATION
2 The Flood Control Act…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. ChadhaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States Ex Rel. Marcus v. HessSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Hughes Aircraft Co. v. United States Ex Rel. SchumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Carmichael v. BellerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- Reeds v. WalkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
- Bowman v. PresleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2009
- Liddell v. HeavnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008
- Morales v. CITY OF OKL. CITY EX REL. OKL. CITY POLICE DEPT.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2010
- Gilbert v. Security Finance Corp. of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.